There is no need in this case to revisit s distinction buckley. Campaign finance law at the time prevented any electioneeri. Will challenges state and federal campaign finance laws. The case involved whether congress had the right to limit the total amount of donations an individual can make, at the federal level, in an election cycle. In defense of mccutcheon v federal election commission by. Plaintiff shaun mccutcheon, an alabama businessman and former member of the republican national committee, challenged that a biennial limit on overall individual contributions infringed upon a donors first amendment rights. Brief for appellant shaun mccutcheon, supra note 6, at 12. Download it once and read it on your kindle device, pc, phones or tablets. Before wednesdays decision, the fec enforced rules that limited a person to. Allowing the superrich to spend so much overpowers the voices of everyday americans, a problem the supreme court made worse with its mccutcheon v. Jul 23 20, set for argument on tuesday, october 8, 20. Federal election commission case which struck a blow against democracy and moved the united states one step closer to plutocracy. Here we report on the direct impact on 2016 election spending or fundraising of four of the supreme courts most significant moneyinpolitics cases. Jul 18 20, brief of appellee federal election commission filed.
At that time, fecas aggregate limits for twoyear election cycles. Federal election commission will increase the political power of members of congress who. There was something unreal about the opinions in mccutcheon v. Supreme court invalidated provisions of the federal election campaign act feca and the bipartisan campaign reform act bcra that imposed aggregate, or total, limits on contributions to political candidates and other contributions to party committees. Fec, a challenge to the aggregate contribution limits. Supreme court took another major step to reshape american campaign finance law. Valeo 1976, colorado republican federal campaign committee v. Fec decision fundamentally changes how people and corporations, thanks to citizens united can fund campaigns, opening the floodgates for millions of dollars in new spending, which had been curtailed by campaign finance laws going back to the early 1970s. Mccutcheon and the other plaintiffs sued the federal election commission, arguing.
The supreme courts mccutchon decision was worse than. Argued march 24, 2009reargued september 9, 2009 decided january 21, 2010. Argued october 8, 20decided april 2, 2014 the right to participate in democracy through political contributions is protected by the first amendment, but that. Why mccutcheon decision is scarier than citizens united with landmark decision handed down today, heres what to know about mccutcheon v.
Democrats pushing constitutional amendment to change bill of rights. We continue our coverage of wednesdays supreme court decision in the case of mccutcheon v. Valeo, a previous case dealing with limits on campaign contributions, should be overruled because it denigrates the core values of the first amendment. Mccutcheon strikes down the aggregate federal contribution limits. Within days of the decision, while pundits and activists. The left is decrying this decision because they long ago became unhinged from the u. Fec is an important first step toward restoring the voice of candidates and party committees and a vindication for all those who support robust. What does the landmark supreme court ruling mean for campaign finance. By a vote of 54, the court ruled that the biennial aggregate limits are unconstitutional under the first amendment. The sunlight foundation put together a resources tool kit on the issues around transparency and disclosure of political contributions and campaign finance in advance of the case.
The decision continued a trend of the roberts court of deregulating the area. The court opined that the aggregate limits do not address the concern of preventing corruption, but instead seriously restrict participation in the democratic process. In defense of mccutcheon v federal election commission. Fec struck down aggregate limits on campaign contributions. Fec and the supreme courts return to buckley 97 thus, in mccutcheon the court provided some muchneeded clar ity by returning to its roots in, thereby resurrecting a nar. Use features like bookmarks, note taking and highlighting while reading when money speaks. It involved a challenge to federal campaign contribution regulations that placed biennial limits on contributions in a twoyear cycle allowed. Two books on the supreme courts latest campaign finance case. Learn vocabulary, terms, and more with flashcards, games, and other study tools. In october of 20, the supreme court heard oral arguments in mccutcheon v.
Fec will impact election cycles law360, new york april 02, 2014, 3. Ramifications of the supreme courts mccutcheon ruling. Each of these contributions would have been compliant with the base contribution limits restricting the amounts that individuals may give to a particular candidate, party committee, or political action committee pac. Federal election commission, legal case in which the u. Federal election commission was a case argued during the october 20 term of the u. A major campaign finance case is up for oral argument before the u. How mccutcheon decision will destroy american politics thanks to scalia and co. Mccutcheon v fec is a federal lawsuit that was argued before the u. Fec, lawyers for the petitioners speak to reporters and answered questions on. Citizens united found that associations, corporations, and labor unions may not be prevented from making independent expenditures in connection with elections.
The good, the bad, and the ugly the week the supreme court issued its decision in mccutcheon v. Fec has the potential to be worse than the 2010 citizens united decision, not because of its. Fec that struck down the aggregate limits on the amount an individual may contribute during a twoyear period to all federal candidates, parties and political action committees combined. Fec, the supreme court ruled today that the overall aggregate biennial limits are invalid under the first amendment. Justice clarence thomas wrote an opinion concurring in the judgment in which he argued that the courts decision in buckley v. The decision held that section 441 of the federal election campaign act feca, which imposed a limit on contributions an individual can make over a twoyear period to national party and federal candidate committees, is unconstitutional. Supreme court will hear oral argument in mccutcheon v. The mccutcheon decision, campaign finance laws, and the first amendment scotus booksinbrief book 1 kindle edition by collins, ronald, skover, david.
Money, money, money how the supreme courts decision in. Fec, described by many as the next citizens united. After graduating from the georgia institute of technology. These opinions examined a series of strategies for circumventing the limits on contributions to candidates imposed by federal election law, but they failed to notice that the limits were no longer breathing. District court for the district of columbia dismissed a lawsuit brought by plaintiffs shaun mccutcheon and the republican national committee rnc challenging the federal election campaign acts the acts biennial limit on individual contributions. Shaun mccutcheon is a businessman and electrical engineer from suburban birmingham, alabama. Supreme court of the united states syllabus citizens united v.
Federal election commission arose in june 2012 when shaun mccutcheon, an alabama businessman, and the republican national committee rnc, which manages the affairs of the national republican party, challenged fecas aggregate limits in u. By a vote of 54, the court ruled that the biennial aggregate limits are unconstitutional under the. Review the latest campaign finance decision to roll out of the supreme court. Last week, the supreme court handed down a decision in the mccutcheon v. What does the landmark supreme court ruling mean for. The supreme court on wednesday struck down limits in federal law on the overall campaign contributions the biggest individual donors may. On april 2, 2014, the supreme court issued a ruling in mccutcheon v. Federal election commission appeal from the united states district court for the district of columbia no. Fec district court 2012 october 2, 2012 on september 28, 2012, the u. At the symposium, one of the authors of this article, liz kennedy, presented a talk entitled, the supreme court, the constitution, and the crisis of. Election commission represented the most important election law decision since citizens united v. Supreme court on april 2, 2014, struck down 54 provisions of the federal election campaign act feca. Reshape the financing of federal elections on october 8, 20, the u.
497 682 1311 476 1535 866 177 150 866 112 1270 355 306 842 600 427 1067 41 129 984 1314 862 1108 1559 878 1110 1361 872 667 1054 295 1118 936 669 1279 1048 279 846